Grand Canyon free essay sample

Identify the concepts, principles, theories, and other information in the course readings, lectures, and other resources that relate to the discussion questions/ romps. Locate at least one scholarly research source which supports your initial response to each question/prompt. The reference may come from the module readings. Write an initial substantive response of 150-250 words in length. Begin your response with a restatement of the question/prompt, and include in-text citation(s) and a reference for each scholarly source used according to the PAP guidelines found in the PAP Style Guide located in the Student Success Center. The restatement of the question/prompt, the references, and the citations are not included in your response word count. Post your substantive initial response to the Main Forum for the module. Your initial response to question/prompt 1 must be posted by day 3 of the module. We will write a custom essay sample on Grand Canyon or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Your initial response to question/ prompt 2 must be posted by day 5 of the module. Contribute to discussion by posting at least one substantive response to another learners post on 3 days of the module. Respond in a manner that initiates or contributes to discussion.Question: What is one area from your Selfsameness that you think you have mastered? (After your initial post, when responding to peers, identify a connection, similarity, or source. ) Gradable Items Discussion Question Details Module 1 Q 2 Directions: Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment: Refer to the document Discussion Forum Philosophy. Download the file, print it, and use the information to guide your participation in the Main Forum. View the tutorial titled Library Resources for Doctoral Learners. Each week, two initial posts and three ongoing contributions are required for a minimum of five separate posts on three separate days of the module. Perform the following tasks to complete his assignment: Identify the discussion questions/ prompts in the Main Forum for the module. Identify the concepts, principles, theories, and other information in the course readings, lectures, and other resources that relate to the discussion questions/prompts. Locate at least one scholarly research source which supports your initial response to each question/prompt. The reference may come from the module readings. Write an initial substantive response of 150-250 words in length. Begin your response with a restatement of the question/prompt, and include in-text citation(s) and a reference for ACH scholarly source used according to the PAP guidelines found in the PAP Style Guide located in the Student Success Center. The restatement of the question/prompt, the references, and the citations are not included in your response word count. Post your substantive initial response to the Main Forum for the module.Your initial response to question/prompt 1 must be posted by day 3 of the module. Your initial response to question/ points possible 6. 0 Details prompt 2 must be posted by day 5 of the module. Contribute to discussion by posting at least one substantive response to another learners cost on 3 days of the module. Respond in a manner that initiates or contributes to discussion. Question: Pick one area of the Doctoral Dispositions where you see yourself as having the most potential. Post it and explain why and how you will develop that disposition and what help you will require to do so.Participation Topic 2: Foundations for Success: Time Management and Empirical Articles Description: Objectives: 18. 0 Duration: 7 days 1 Identify the components of an empirical article and assess whether a given article is empirical. 2. Evaluate personal time management skills. 3. Assess arsenal skills related to use of PAP writing and formatting. Topic Material: Textbook 1 . The Education Dissertation: A Guide for Practitioner Scholars Read chapter 2. Lecture Note 2. REST 811 Lecture 2 Read Lecture 2. Other 3. Dry. Ronald Barman on Time Management Read Dry.Ronald Barman on Time Management. Electronic Resource 4. Time Management Bausch Watch the Randy Bausch Lecture, Time Management. Electronic Resource 7. How Good Is Your Time Management? Read How good is your time management? Electronic Resource 8. Activity Logs: Finding Out How You Really Spend Your Time Scan Activity logs: Finding out how you really spend your time. Other 9. Monitoring Your Time Read Monitoring Your Time. Do the exercise and view the interactive presentation, Are You Managing Your Time Correctly? in the resource. Other 11 . PAP Self-Assessment 12.PAP Self-Assessment Answers use this to score your PAP Self-Assessment. Other 13. Comparison Matrix Use this to complete the Comparison Matrix Assignment. Other 14. Empirical Research Checklist use this as a resource to determine if an article is an empirical article. Other 15. Discussion Forum Philosophy 16. Library Resources for Doctoral Learners PAP Self-Assessment 40. 0 Locate and complete the PAP Selfsameness. Score your answers using the key provided. Comparison Matrix 100. 0 Empirical research is the foundation to scholarly research and scholarly writing.An empirical article is defined as one that reports actual results of a research study. The article will include a description of the study, an introduction, a research question, an explanation of the studs methodology, a presentation of the results of the study, and a conclusion that discusses the results and suggests topics for further study. This assignment will help you octet and identify empirical research studies. Details Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment: This assignment uses a grading rubric.Locate and print the Comparison Matrix found in the Additional Resources folder of Canyon Connect. Locate and print the Empirical Research Checklist found in the Additional Resources folder of Canyon Connect. Locate and read the Library Tutorial on inserting persistent links into a Word document. The link to the Tutorial is http:// wampum. Du/Documents/upload/ -guidepdPDFccess and read Article 1 by going to http:// library. cuCueedDu048/login? urURLttp:// search. ebObscenestcoComogin. asAspse=Eite Access and read Article 2 by going to http:// library. gcGUedDu048/ login? urURLttp:// search. bsBoohooscoComogin. asAspsm M; AN = 27436222site=ehghostlikemp;scscoop=site The Comparison Matrix contains a table with three columns and six rows. The columns are titled Article 1, Article 2, and Article 3, and the rows are titled Title, Persistent GCGUCCIibrary Link, Purpose of the Study, Research Question(s), Sample Population(s), and Limitations. You will see that the appropriate information from Article 1 has been included. Perform the following tasks to complete this assignment: Use the Article 2 persistent link as provided above and in the Comparison Matrix to locate and read Article 2.After reading Article 2, provide the appropriate information in the cells in the Article 2 column of the Comparison Matrix. Go to the GCGUCCIibrary. usUsehe Find Journal Articles search feature found on the home page of the GCGUCCIibrary to locate an empirical article in your field of interest. usUsehe Empirical Research Checklist to determine whether a study is empirical. This will be Article 3 in the Comparison Matrix. After locating and eaeatinghe empirical article you found, provide the appropriate information in the cells in the Article 3 column of the Comparison Matrix. Module 2 DQQ 6. Directions: Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment Refer to the document Discussion Forum Philosophy. Download the file, print it, and use the information to guide your participation in the Main Forum. View the tutorial titled Library Resources for Doctoral Learners. Each week, two initial posts and three Ongoing contributions are required for a minimum of five separate posts on three separate days of the ncincluden-text citation(s) and a reference for each Details scholarly source used according to the APPAPuidelines found in the APPAPtyle Guide located in the Student Success Center. The restatement of the question/prompt, the references, and the citations are not included in your response word count. Post your substantive initial response to the Main posted by day 3 of the module. Your initial response to question/ prompt 2 must be posted by day 5 of the module. Contribute to discussion by posting at least one substantive response to another learners post on 3 days of the module. Respond in a manner that initiates or contributes to discussion. Question: using the information you provided in your application to the GCGAL.octoral Program, briefly describe a potential topic of interest for your dissertation research. How do you believe this research will contribute to the body of knowledge in your field? Module 2 DQQ 6. 0 Directions: Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment: Refer to the document Discussion Forum philosophy. Download the file, print It, and use the information to guide your participation in the Main Forum. View the tutorial titled Library Resources for Doctoral Learners. Each week, two initial posts and three ongoing contributions are required for a minimum of five separate posts on three separate days of the module.Perform the following tasks to complete this assignment: Identify the discussion questions/ prompts in the Main Forum for the module. Details Identify the concepts, principles, theories, and other information in the course readings, lectures, and other resources that relate to the discussion questions/prompts. Locate at least one scholarly research source which supports your initial response to each question/prompt. The reference may come from the module readings. Write an initial substantive response of 150-250 words in length.

How Authors and Editors Can Work Better Together

How Authors and Editors Can Work Better Together How Authors and Editors Can Work Better Together Reedsy was created with the purpose of allowing independent authors to work with some of the best editorial and design talent out there, and build long-lasting, fruitful collaborations. In this guest post, editor and novelist Andrew Lowe explains how self-publishing has transformed the author-editor connection into a powerful creative partnership.Have a look at this sentence:â€Å"Jim dropped the amulet into the bag and hooked it through his belt.†You could argue that there is a confusion over the object here. Is Jim hooking the amulet, or the bag, through his belt? The ‘correct’ form would be something like:â€Å"Jim dropped the amulet into the bag, which he hooked through his belt.†The object confusion has gone; it’s clear that the bag, not the amulet, is being hooked through Jim’s belt. It’s technically correct, but dead on the page. We’ve fine-tuned the mechanism of the sentence, but murdered it as a piece of flowing prose.A good editor – particularly in the case of fiction – understands that the work is a delicate balance of art and science and that sometimes one has to be sacrificed in favor of the other.In this example, I would keep the original sentence, arguing that the technical imperfection is secondary to the feel of the prose.Other editors might reach for our favorite mantra: never confuse the reader. But it would be fussy to argue that a reader, immersed in the wider narrative, would stop to ponder the amulet/bag question as presented here.It’s a subjective judgment call which, for me, taps into the most important quality that authors should expect from your editor: a passion for collaboration. A "passion for collaboration" is the most important quality authors should expect from their editor @ReedsyHQ When you hire an editor, you are not giving over your precious darling to be defaced and remoulded. You’re paying for a professional eye; a sympathetic assistant who will work to a set of consistent criteria and help you to make your book as good as it possibly can be.* * *So, let’s define terms.Actually, let’s not. If you Google something like ‘book editing copy line structural’ (and you really shouldn’t) then you’ll soon be sucked into a swirl of fuzzy definitions and conflicting concepts.Like most creative disciplines in the digital age, the different types of book editing are ever-changing, mostly because of the connected and collaborative nature of online tools.I was a consumer journalist – mostly at editor level – for fifteen years, and I understand the need for specific publications to adhere to established rules. They face numerous copy-streams flowing in from hundreds of writers to be worked on by a multitude of s ub-editors. A unified house style ensures that the task isn’t tethered to a single individual.Traditional book publishing has generally followed this model, for similar reasons. It is an industry and must operate at industrial scale, with hundreds of titles taking their place on a trusted and cost-effective production line. The editing process is often just another cog in this corporate machine.But the rise of self-publishing has presented an opportunity for the process to be more collaborative; to strengthen the relationship between author and editor.Because self-publishing does not mean ‘do it all yourself’.I believe that all the very best creatives – even those with a reputation as stand-alone auteurs – rely on some form of collaboration to realise their vision. The ‘self’ in self-publishing is more about self-empowerment. You make the decisions – including which editor is right for you. But an editor can now care about the wo rk almost as much as the author. "The ‘self’ in self-publishing is more about self-empowerment. You make the decisions." - @andylowe99